OAIC Rejects FRSC Rule Restricting Preaching in Commercial Vehicles

The Organisation of African Instituted Churches (OAIC) has opposed a proposed provision in the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) Establishment Act (Amendment) Bill that seeks to prohibit preaching and other religious activities in commercial vehicles, describing the move as a potential violation of Nigerians’ constitutional rights.

The Christian organisation said that although it supports efforts to improve road safety across the country, banning religious preaching in public transport is not the appropriate solution to reducing road accidents. According to the council, such a restriction could undermine the constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and freedom of expression.

OAIC argued that distractions capable of causing road crashes extend far beyond religious preaching. The group pointed to mobile phone use while driving, excessive speed, loud music, reckless driving, poor vehicle maintenance, and passenger misconduct as more significant contributors to accidents on Nigerian roads.

The proposed amendment, currently before the National Assembly, aims to strengthen road safety regulations by prohibiting activities considered capable of distracting commercial drivers, including preaching, hawking and other passenger-related engagements.

The council urged lawmakers to reconsider the controversial provision, insisting that legislation should promote public safety without infringing on citizens’ fundamental rights.

It added that religious messages have long formed part of Nigeria’s public life and should not be restricted without clear evidence that they significantly contribute to road crashes.

OAIC also called on the Federal Government, the FRSC, transport unions, religious bodies and civil society organisations to engage in broader consultations before the bill is finalised.

The group maintained that dialogue among stakeholders would produce balanced regulations capable of improving road safety while preserving constitutional freedoms.

The proposal continues to generate public debate as lawmakers consider the amendment.